By: Justice (R) Muzaffar Ali<\/p>\n
Indeed, the judgment was enthusiastically awaited by the people of GB, the federal government and people of AJK. Obviously, Gbians were considering the Supreme Court of Pakistan as their last hope to determine their constitutional status which was pending for more than seven decades on a pretext of Kashmir issue. Lastly, the judgment was announced by the Supreme Court on 17\/01\/2019 and became public property.<\/p>\n
Gbians, since their independence, are ruled by the Federal Governments either by imposing FCR or by \u201cadministrative orders\u201d. Persistent denial of granting fundamental rights and constitutional status to the people of Gilgit Baltistan, in fact, tantamounts to denial of aspirations of people towards Pakistan. The prejudicial attitude of Federal governments compelled people to invoke the constitutional jurisdiction of Supreme Court as last resort to address their basic grievances. Eventually, they knocked the doors of Supreme Court and the Supreme Court, for the first time, delivered a judgment in this regard in the year 1999. Whereby, the august Supreme Court recognized fundamental rights of GB as citizens of Pakistan and directed the federation to initiate appropriate administrative\/legislative measures, even federation was directed to make necessary constitutional enactments.<\/p>\n
The Federal Government ignored the above-cited judgment and continued \u201cadministrative orders\u201d time and again. This worse situation was enough to awake Gbians to protest against. People raised strong protest resultantly, Nawaz government constituted a facts finding committee headed by Mr. Sartaj Aziz, the former foreign minister, to submit its recommendations about constitutional status of GB. The recommendations were submitted to the government but all in vein. The government instead again framed an executive order called \u201cThe government of Gilgit Baltistan order, 2018\u201d. The people lodged strong protest against, but imposed.<\/p>\n
When Tehreek-e-Insaaf established Federal Government in result of general elections, extended hope to the people of Gilgit Baltistan with an express impression, to table the point of \u201cprovisional provincial status\u201d before the cabinet meeting in pursuance of recommendations made by Sartaj Aziz committee. The point was tabled twice before the cabinet meeting but turned down. Khan\u2019s cabinet apparently surrendered before an effective protest launched by the AJK leaders and to cover this U-turn, the government introduced a new \u201cexecutive order\u201d. The Supreme Court attached the new order with the instant judgment calling it as \u201cProposed Order\u201d.<\/p>\n
The \u201cProposed Order\u201d attached with the instant judgment seems far better than that of previous orders, for its salient features i.e. (a) its preamble speaks about the intention of federal government to make GB a \u201cprovisional province\u201d till pending disposal of Kashmir issue. (b) It admits the new \u201corder\u201d to be a temporary arrangement till the time constitutional amendments are sought. Despite of above narrated good features in the order, it is again an executive one having discriminatory provisions contradictory to full fundamental rights which can be provided to the people of Gigit Baltistan under the constitution.<\/p>\n
The petitioners almost in all petitions have assailed the vires of executive orders including the \u201cProposed Order\u201d attached with judgment, with the plea that, the executive authorities including the president having no sanction of constitution to frame such orders as no article including article 157 of the constitution empowers them to frame and approve such orders in respect of Gilgit baltistan. The bench while framing questions for their answer in the judgment, totally ignored this crucial issue to frame and to answer. Instead, the honorable bench went to rationalize the \u201cProposed Order\u201d without going into its vires and constitutional sanction behind it. In my opinion, the honorable bench has exercised dictum of necessity once again to meet the prevailing situation rather go into the issue of vires of the order under articles of the constitution. The honorable bench provided its auspices to it and bestowed with judicial imprimatur and permanence. The verdict in favor of \u201cProposed Order\u201d would encourage the executive authorities to resile from their promise to bring a bill before the parliament in respect of a provisional province for GB.<\/p>\n
The advantageous aspect of the instant verdict is that, the Supreme Court categorically rejected the propaganda raised by the AJK political leadership holding that, quoted; \u201cthat is why we hold that the committee\u2019s recommendations relating to the provision and enforcement of fundamental rights provided by the constitution must be implemented immediately and with full force and effect. As a matter of law as well as morality\u201d. Unquoted, the supreme court is in full agreement with the recommendations made by the Sartaj Aziz committee and it transpires from the judgment, while reading paras 21, 22 and 23 that, a status of provisional province of GB pending disposal of the Kashmir issue is not fatal and injurious to the Kashmir issue, even after introducing amendments into the constitution.<\/p>\n
Last but not least, the Supreme Court verdict has thrown the ball into the court of leadership in Gilgit Baltistan who belong to national parties i.e. Tehreek-e-Insaaf, Peoples Party and Muslim League. It is of their task, how they play their influence before their central leadership to motivate them to table a bill before the parliament and to seek amendments in the constitution to award a provisional provincial status to Gilgit Baltistan. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
By: Justice (R) Muzaffar Ali Indeed, the judgment was enthusiastically awaited by the people of GB, the federal government and people of AJK. Obviously, Gbians were considering the Supreme Court of Pakistan as their last hope to determine their constitutional status which was pending for more than seven decades on a pretext of Kashmir issue. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":584,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n